|
''True Motives 84 (Pty) Ltd v Mahdi and Another''〔() JOL 23207 (SCA).〕 is an important case in South African law, heard in the Supreme Court Of Appeal (by Scott JA, Cameron JA, Heher JA, Jafta JA and Combrinck JA) on 28 August 2008, with judgment handed down on 3 March 2009. PM Kennedy SC appeared for the appellant. There was no appearance for the first respondent, while AE Franklin SC (with DL Wood) appeared for the second respondent and PJ Olsen SC (with AA Gabriel) for the ''amicus curiae''. == Facts == The appellant, True Motives 84 (Pty) Ltd, and the first respondent, Mahdi, were owners of adjoining properties. When the first respondent undertook extensive renovations to his property, the appellant objected, challenging the approval of the relevant building plans. The court ''a quo'' dismissed the application, and on appeal the issues were confined to * the proper interpretation of the National Building Regulations and Building Standards Act;〔Act 103 of 1977.〕 * the duties of a local authority with regard to the approval of building plans; and * the validity of the delegation of power to the plans examiner. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「True Motives v Mahdi」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|